Meta risks being fined $1.4 trillion for causing social media addiction A landmark lawsuit that could change the face of Meta's platforms forever

How far is it acceptable to make a platform deliberately difficult to leave? Meta, the conglomerate that owns Facebook and Instagram and is currently valued at approximately $1.43 trillion, is being sued by twenty-nine U.S. states for allegedly violating online child protection laws, including the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). According to prosecutors, Meta knowingly built an addictive product, designing certain features to maximize time spent online, engagement, and consequently the volume of advertising viewed. A dynamic that echoes, in tone and ambition, the landmark lawsuits against the tobacco industry.

Features such as infinite scroll (new content loads automatically when the user reaches the bottom of the page, eliminating the need to click), push notifications, autoplay, likes, social metrics, and recommendation systems would not simply be features designed to make the experience smoother. More time online means more engagement, more ad impressions, and more revenue — a significant detail for Meta, given that advertising accounts for approximately 98% of the company's total revenue.

@newyorker In a conversation with David Remnick on #NewYorkerRadio, the social psychologist Jonathan Haidt talks about the addictive nature of social media and what more we should be doing to protect children from it. Listen to their discussion at the link in our bio. #socialmedia #pyschology #socialpsychology #podcast original sound - The New Yorker

Prosecutors argue that company executives were aware of the potential negative effects of their products, and that certain internal research into user risks was concealed. Among the issues cited in the lawsuit are social comparison (the act of evaluating one's self-worth by measuring it against what other people post online), beauty filters, exposure to potentially harmful content, and the impact of social media use on mental health.

One particularly significant case within the lawsuit is that of Project Mercury, which reportedly found that people who stopped using Facebook and Instagram experienced reductions in depression, anxiety, and loneliness. The charge Meta faces is therefore not whether its platforms are addictive, but whether the company was aware of this, having nonetheless chosen to build its business around that very dynamic. The lawsuit combines several theories of liability, from false advertising to data privacy, as well as violations of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

@resetwithnicki Which of the 5 signs have you noticed? • • • #doomscrolling #brainrot #phoneaddiction #neuroscience original sound - fivebarbedsun

The stock market is already reacting to the situation, with Meta having lost 4.5% of its share value in a single day, dropping from $800 per share to $547 — a loss of approximately 30%. If the company is ultimately sanctioned, it will not only have to compensate the states involved in the lawsuit, but will also be forced to modify its platforms. For some users, particularly younger ones, infinite feeds could disappear; likes and other social validation indicators could be restricted; push notifications could be scaled back and the recommendation algorithm reined in.

The 29 states involved are seeking approximately $200 billion in damages, but the bill could climb far higher: consumer protection laws in America allow, under certain circumstances, for penalties to be calculated on the basis of individual violations. If this interpretation were applied in its broadest form, the total could reach approximately $1.4 trillion — the entire market value of Meta.

What to read next