
What are the most expensive places in the world to take a photo?
Beautiful locations, but you know that even beauty costs money
April 18th, 2025
Taking a photo in front of some of the world’s most iconic destinations isn’t always as simple as paying the entrance fee to a museum. The cost of capturing a memorable shot can vary significantly depending on location, accessibility, and the various fees and regulations involved. A recent study by Heepsy analyzed over 50 of the most famous photo destinations in the world, offering a comprehensive look at the costs associated with these spots. The results revealed a surprising disparity between admission price and site popularity, highlighting some of the most expensive and sought-after places to snap a photo. Topping the list is the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, which holds the highest composite score of 100. As the tallest building in the world, the Burj Khalifa has a considerable entrance fee of $108. With 17 million annual visitors and 29.4 million online searches, the combination of its price and its “record-breaking building” status makes it the most expensive place to take a personal photo. In second place is Mount Kilimanjaro, with a score of 97.3. Although it has a more moderate entrance fee of $70, the mountain ranks highly due to its global reputation as a bucket-list destination. While only around 50,000 people visit Kilimanjaro each year, the high permit costs and limited accessibility raise the price for photographers. The site records 5.5 million searches annually – a figure that shows the huge interest in capturing its famous snow-capped peak.
@luxouxx POV: You're falling from the Burj Khalifa in Dubai #burjkhalifa #dubai original sound - LUXOUX
The Eiffel Tower in Paris is another top destination, ranking third with a score of 94.6. With an entrance fee of $39, it is relatively affordable compared to other locations on the list. Yet the tower attracts about 7 million annual visitors and receives 23.4 million global searches. Its status as one of the most photographed monuments in the world contributes to its high score, offering a mix of accessibility and broad digital interest. Big Ben in London follows right behind, ranking fourth with a score of 91.9. With an entrance fee of $46, it is slightly more expensive than the Eiffel Tower, but still draws a considerable crowd. With 5 million visitors and 23.9 million global searches, Big Ben maintains its status as a symbol of London both in real life and across digital platforms. The Galápagos Islands come in fifth, but with the highest entrance fee of any destination on this list, at $200. This remote archipelago is known for its extraordinary wildlife and unique ecosystems, making it a premium destination for nature photographers. Although only 329,000 visitors arrive each year, it generates 1.5 million searches annually. Despite the high cost, the islands’ unparalleled biodiversity and breathtaking landscapes make them an exclusive and coveted location for photographers.
In sixth place is the Sagrada Familia in Barcelona, with a score of 86.5. With an entrance fee of $29, it’s one of the most affordable locations. The basilica attracts 4.7 million visitors and 17.2 million online searches, showing its strong appeal to architecture and culture enthusiasts. The Grand Canyon in the United States ranks seventh, with a score of 83.8. With an entrance fee of $35, it’s one of the most accessible photo destinations. Attracting 15.7 million visitors annually and generating 15.7 million online searches, the Grand Canyon is a popular spot for capturing breathtaking landscapes. Its popularity, both online and offline, secures its place among the world’s top photography destinations. Machu Picchu, the historic Incan site in Peru, takes eighth place with a score of 81.1. With an entrance fee of $45, it remains an accessible destination for photographers looking to capture a piece of history. The site draws 1.6 million visitors each year and generates 14.9 million searches.
after 4 days of walking and 1900 steps, i walked into the machu picchu pic.twitter.com/YXhi6zbFkY
— artfujiworld (@artfujiworld) April 15, 2025
The Palace of Versailles in France ranks ninth with a score of 78.4. With an entrance fee of $32, it remains relatively inexpensive compared to other iconic European sites. Although it attracts 15 million visitors each year, it only receives 1.6 million searches. This indicates that while the palace enjoys strong physical interest, its digital presence is not as prominent. However, its historical importance and grandeur keep it relevant for photographers. Rounding out the top ten is the Zhangjiajie National Forest Park in China, with a score of 75.7. Known for its stunning landscapes and towering sandstone pillars, the park charges a modest entrance fee of $30. Despite drawing 15.9 million visitors annually, it receives only 305,000 online searches. This suggests that while the park is a physically popular destination, its digital footprint remains relatively small, limiting its ranking despite the high number of visitors. The study highlights an interesting trend in the tourism and photography industries. As personal photography becomes more regulated, the cost of taking a photo in these locations is influenced not just by entrance fees but also by additional factors like permits, equipment restrictions, and drone rules. This growing gap between physical accessibility and digital demand shows how some of the most famous spots are slowly becoming luxury experiences.